He seemed very sure about this. Maybe he was listening to Michael Medved, right wing radio hack, trash hybrid vehicles as he is wont to do.... instead of looking at the facts.
Carseek.com says:
It is true that the initial cost of such a car is generally $3,000 - $6,000 higher than a similarly-sized conventional vehicle, but there are post-purchase savings that may off-set the initial outlay.
Earth to Gosch: that's less than half of your $10K number you probably heard on right-wing radio.
Hybrids are a great idea and Detroit has dropped the ball by not getting into the game and concentrating on short-term profit selling SUVs.
Hybrids are a VERY viable option, which is why they are on waiting lists instead of on sale, even though they cost a little more. In fact although the list price of my Prius went down right soon after I bought it, erasing my tax rebate benefits, I'm not complaining--because my family is still way ahead:
- Fuel savings of 35% (at $4 a gallon that adds up)
- Since you slow down using the electric generator instead of brakes, you save on power train, tire, and brake wear.
- Hybrid cars (like our Prius) generally come with comfortable extras like pushbutton start and and nice stereo systems (and you can hear the stereo!)
- Cheap maintenance. Gosch said to his formidable Democratic opponent Bethany Wojahn "Well, I hope you car's battery doesn't die because those are $10-$15K to replace." Alert to Brian G: if you bothered to read Consumer Reports, hybrids have had a very good track record, largely because the battery is just part of the system, they are gas + electric. That's why they call it a hybrid.
UPDATE: As of January 2010 my Prius batteries are doing just fine, thank you.
CP, my favorite neocon (my husband) says exactly the same thing, and will not hear anything else. When I try to present the facts, he interrupts me and won't allow me to finish.
ReplyDeleteIt is like, "Don't confuse me with facts--my mind is made up!"
I'm sure he's a very nice guy, but the right wing noise machine is very good at slowly training otherwise bright, compassionate people not to thing critically on certain focus-group issues.
ReplyDeleteHuxley called it "groupthink." He saw Fox News coming way back in the 50s. But I still think he'd be impressed today at what they have accomplished.